Research Article
Print
Research Article
Preliminary laboratory evaluation of Beauveria bassiana (Bals.) Vuill. for the control of Necrobia rufipes (De Geer) on stored copra
expand article infoDantje Tarore, Vivi Bernadeth Montong, Jusuf Manueke, Yermia Semuel Mokosuli§, Lucia Cecilia Mandey
‡ Sam Ratulangi University, Manado, Indonesia
§ Manado State University, Manado, Indonesia
Open Access

Abstract

This study investigates the efficacy of the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana (Bals.) Vuill. (Ascomycota: Hypocreales) in controlling Necrobia rufipes (De Geer) (Coleoptera: Cleridae), a significant pest responsible for economic losses in copra production, aiming to determine the effective concentration required to achieve substantial mortality and reduce copra damage in storage systems. Employing a completely randomized design with five treatments and three replications, the research assessed B. bassiana concentrations (10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, and 30%) on N. rufipes mortality and copra weight loss across pest population sizes ranging from 8 to 24 adults, with mortality recorded weekly over one month and weight loss measured after one month. Data analysis using analysis of variance, followed by a least significant difference test and probit analysis, revealed mortality rates from 14.67% (±2.31%) at 10% concentration to 69.33% (±3.79%) at 30%, with an LC50 of 23.611% (±1.12%), while copra weight loss increased from 1.33 g (±0.15 g) with 8 adults to 6.87 g (±0.42 g) with 21 adults, strongly correlating with pest density. These findings demonstrate that B. bassiana effectively reduces N. rufipes populations, with higher concentrations enhancing control, and the identified LC50 provides a practical application threshold, underscoring the influence of pest population size on copra weight loss and the need for timely intervention. This approach offers a sustainable, biological strategy to protect copra, potentially minimizing economic losses in tropical storage systems.

Key Words

Beauveria bassiana, biological pest management, copra storage pest control, Entomopathogenic fungus, Necrobia rufipes

Introduction

Copra, the dried endosperm of coconut, is a vital agricultural commodity in tropical regions, serving as the primary source of crude coconut oil and products like biodiesel, cosmetics, and animal feed. Its production, however, is frequently undermined by pest infestations, particularly in storage, where losses can significantly impact small-scale farmers and economies reliant on coconut trade. Among these pests, Necrobia rufipes (De Geer, 1775) (Coleoptera: Cleridae), a coleopteran beetle, stands out as a widespread threat to stored copra, causing weight reductions of up to 5–10% within three months in regions like North Sulawesi, Indonesia (Wang et al. 2022; Williams and Scharf 2024). Similar damage is reported globally, from Italy (Savoldelli et al. 2020), to Ambon (Patty et al. 2023), highlighting its status as a major post-harvest pest in tropical climates. Savoldelli et al. (2020) specifically highlighted the emergence of N. rufipes as a pest in pet food stores in Europe, noting that both adults and larvae can infest pet food packaging, entering through air vent valves. Their research also explored potential monitoring tools, finding that a mixture of pet food and methyl cyclopentenolone was highly attractive to N. rufipes adults, suggesting its use as a lure in traps. The growing concern about N. rufipes in pet food is driven by its ability to develop on a wide range of pet food ingredients, leading to product contamination and economic losses. Other pests, such as Carpophilus dimidiatus Fabricius, 1792 (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae) and Tribolium castaneum Herbst, 1797 (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae), also contribute to losses, especially in copra with high moisture content (>15%) (Kalshoven 1981; Haines 1991) and their importance in stored product damage continues to be recognized (e.g., Arifin et al. 2022; Nuraini et al. 2022).

Efforts to manage N. rufipes have historically relied on physical methods (e.g., improved drying) and chemical controls (e.g., fumigation, synthetic insecticides), yet these approaches often fail to deliver consistent results, particularly for resource-limited farmers (Montong et al. 2022). Controversy surrounds chemical methods due to their environmental impact, cost, and pest resistance, driving interest in biological alternatives (Montong et al. 2022). Entomopathogenic fungi, such as Metarhizium anisopliae (Metchnikoff) Sorokin, 1883 (Ascomycota: Hypocreales) and Beauveria bassiana (Bals.) Vuill., 1912 (Ascomycota: Hypocreales), have emerged as promising biocontrol agents, with prior studies demonstrating their potential against copra pests (Tarore et al. 2023). While effective application strategies for B. bassiana against N. rufipes on stored copra require further research, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of different concentrations of B. bassiana culture in controlling this pest and determining its impact on copra weight loss. The results identify a promising concentration range demonstrating significant biocontrol activity, suggesting a potential threshold for developing practical application methods. Effective monitoring of N. rufipes populations in stored product environments presents several challenges. Traditional methods may be inadequate due to the species’ specific behavior and habitat preferences. For instance, N. rufipes’s ability to infest pet food packaging through small openings like air vents (Savoldelli et al. 2020) necessitates monitoring strategies that can detect infestations in these confined spaces. Furthermore, the development of effective attractants and traps tailored to N. rufipes is an ongoing area of research.

Materials and methods

This research comprised two components: laboratory and field studies. The laboratory experiments were conducted at Sam Ratulangi University, Manado, Indonesia. The field investigations were carried out in copra storage warehouses owned by copra collectors in Kombi District, Minahasa Regency, Indonesia. The study spanned eight months, from February 2024 to September 2024.

Methods

This study utilized a completely randomized design (CRD) with five treatments and three replications to evaluate the effect of B. bassiana concentration on the mortality of N. rufipes adults on copra. A quantitative experimental approach was employed to investigate the cause-and-effect relationship between independent (fungal concentration) and dependent (mortality and copra weight loss) variables. Two experiments were conducted: one assessing mortality and another evaluating copra weight loss.

For the mortality experiment, five concentrations of B. bassiana culture were tested: A = 10% (10 g/100 mL distilled water), B = 15% (15 g/100 mL), C = 20% (20 g/100 mL), D = 25% (25 g/100 mL), E = 30% (30 g/100 mL), and F = control (0 g/100 mL). Each treatment used 25 adult N. rufipes individuals placed with 150 g of copra as a feeding substrate. For the weight loss experiment, five pest population sizes were tested: G = 8 adults, H = 12 adults, I = 16 adults, J = 20 adults, and K = 24 adults, each with 150 g of copra. Mortality was recorded weekly for one month, starting one week post-treatment, while copra weight loss was measured after one month.

Sampling of the test insects did not differentiate between males and females; instead, individuals of the same imago age were selected, specifically 1–3 days post-emergence to ensure consistency in physiological condition. Furthermore, mortality observations did not account for potential differences in resistance between male and female insects to pathogen infection.

Data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Significant differences [Sig (0.000) < α (0.05)] were further assessed with the Least Significant Difference (LSD) test. The effective lethal concentration (LC50) of B. bassiana for controlling N. rufipes was determined using probit analysis, focusing on treatments C (20 g), D (25 g), and E (30 g), which approached 50% mortality.

Research procedures

Preparation

  1. Rearing of test insects (Necrobia rufipes)
  • N. rufipes was propagated by collecting infested copra showing signs of pest attack from storage warehouses and transferring it to the Plant Pests and Diseases Laboratory for rearing.
  • One kilogram of infested copra was placed in plastic jars, covered with white azahi cloth, and maintained for 1.5–2 months until the N. rufipes population multiplied sufficiently to serve as test insects.
  1. Preparation of B. bassiana culture on rice medium
  • Rice was steamed until half-cooked, cooled in a sterile cabinet, and packed into transparent plastic bags (20 g per bag).
  • Pure B. bassiana cultures (derived from Paraeucosmetus spp., North Sulawesi) were inoculated into each 20-g rice package and incubated for one week until ready for application.

Experimental application

  1. Application of B. bassiana to N. rufipes adults
  • The pathogen was applied to test insects in jars containing 150 g of sterilized copra and 25 N. rufipes adults per treatment.
  • After application, jars were sealed with white Asahi cloth (Japan).
  • Observations began one-week post-application and continued for one month, with weekly intervals. Dead N. rufipes was collected to calculate mortality per treatment, assessed in week two, while copra weight loss was measured in week four.
  1. Copra weight loss assessment
  • Weight loss was determined as the reduction in copra mass due to N. rufipes feeding during the study period.
  • Copra (150 g per treatment) were weighed at the start of the experiment using an electronic balance with 0.01 g precision, placed individually in jars, and then infested with varying N. rufipes adult populations according to the treatment levels. Jars were covered with cloth to allow for ventilation.
  • After one month, the copra was removed from the jars and weighed again. The difference between the initial and final weights represented the copra weight loss.

Data analysis

Mortality of adult N. rufipes due to B. bassiana application was calculated using the following formula:

Mortality(%)=Number of dead insectsTotal number of observed test insects×100

Copra weight loss resulting from N. rufipes infestation was determined as:

Weight loss = Initial sample weight − Final sample weight

Data on mortality and weight loss were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA). All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 21.0 software.

Results and discussion

Effect of Beauveria bassiana concentration on Necrobia rufipes adult mortality on copra

The concentration of B. bassiana significantly influenced the mortality of adult N. rufipes on copra. Mortality, measured as cumulative mortality after one month of exposure, was directly proportional to fungal concentration, with higher doses resulting in greater mortality rates. Mean mortality rates are presented in Table 1.

The highest mortality (69.33% ± 3.79%) was observed at a 30% concentration, while the lowest (14.67% ± 2.31%) occurred at 10%. This trend likely results from increased toxin levels—such as beauvericin, beauverolide, bassianolide, and acids—in higher B. bassiana concentrations, which impair insect physiology and reproduction (Wang et al. 2018).

Regression analysis revealed a positive coefficient (2.263), indicating that a 1% increase in B. bassiana concentration raised mortality by 2.263%. The relationship between concentration (X) and mortality (Y) is depicted in Figure 1, with a coefficient of determination (R² = 0.953), suggesting that 95.3% of mortality variation is explained by concentration.

Previous studies support these findings, showing that N. rufipes mortality increases with higher concentrations of entomopathogenic fungi like M. anisopliae and B. bassiana (Fathy et al. 2025). This infection process culminates in the death of the insect (Turrà and Di Pietro 2015), which directly influences the subsequent impact of N. rufipes population density on copra weight loss. Impact of N. rufipes Infestation on Copra Weight Loss.

Table 1.

Mean Mortality of Adult N. rufipes on Copra Due to B. bassiana Application.

Treatment (Concentration) Mean Mortality (%) Notation*
F (0 g/100 mL) 1.33 ± 0.58 a
A (10 g/100 mL) 14.67 ± 2.31 b
B (15 g/100 mL) 22.67 ± 2.89 b
C (20 g/100 mL) 36.00 ± 3.46 c
D (25 g/100 mL) 52.00 ± 4.04 d
E (30 g/100 mL) 69.33 ± 3.79 e
α = 0.05. Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different (LSD test).
Figure 1. 

Relationship Between B. bassiana Concentration (X) and Adult N. rufipes Mortality (Y).

Impact of Necrobia rufipes infestation on copra weight loss

The study on copra weight loss due to N. rufipes infestation revealed that pest population density significantly influenced weight reduction. Results from laboratory experiments are presented in Table 2.

The highest weight loss (6.87 ± 0.42 g) occurred at a population density of 24 N. rufipes adults, while the lowest (1.13 ± 0.12 g) was observed with 8 adults. Copra weight loss increased with population density, as larger populations require more food, leading to greater copra consumption. Storage pests like N. rufipes depend entirely on stored commodities for survival, and higher densities exacerbate damage (Manueke et al. 2023). Arifin et al. (2022) define copra weight loss as the reduction of material due to pest consumption, while Nuraini et al. (2022) note that storage pests cause quantitative losses, quality degradation, and reduced seed viability. These pests vary in morphology, preferred food sources, and environmental requirements for survival and reproduction.

Regression analysis showed a positive coefficient of 0.316, indicating a direct relationship between N. rufipes population density (X) and copra weight loss (Y). The regression equation, Y = 0.316X − 0.672, implies: (1) a constant of -0.672 as the baseline treatment value; (2) a 1% increase in population density increases weight loss by 0.316 g; and (3) a coefficient of determination (R² = 0.9076) suggests that 90.76% of weight loss variation is explained by population density. This relationship is depicted in Figure 2.

Storage pests cause both quantitative (reduced quantity) and qualitative (decreased quality) damage to stored products. They can infest commodities pre-harvest, during transport, and in storage, with warehouses providing ideal conditions—abundant food, favorable environments, and low natural enemy presence—allowing rapid population growth and significant damage in a short time (Hill 1990; Tarore et al. 2023).

Table 2.

Analysis of Variance Results for Copra Weight Loss Due to N. rufipes Infestation in Laboratory Conditions.

Treatment (Population of N. rufipes) Treatment (Population of N. rufipes) Notation*
F (0 adults) 0.20 a
G (8 adults) 1.13 b
H (12 adults) 2.13 c
I (16 adults) 4.43 d
J (20 adults) 5.23 e
K (24 adults) 6.87 f
α = 0.05. Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different (LSD test).
Figure 2. 

Relationship Between N. rufipes Population Density (X) and Copra Weight Loss (Y).

Effective concentration (LC50) of B. bassiana culture on N. rufipes adult mortality on copra

The effective lethal concentration (LC50) of B. bassiana culture required to achieve 50% mortality of N. rufipes adults on copra was determined using probit analysis. The results are presented in Table 3.

The probit analysis results in Table 3 show that the effective concentration dose of the B. bassiana pathogen culture on the mortality of the pest N. rufipes on copra lies between treatment C, which is a concentration of the B. bassiana pathogen culture of 20 g/100 cc of distilled water, causing a mortality of N. rufipes adults of 36.00%, and treatment D, which is a concentration of the B. bassiana pathogen culture of 20 g/100 cc of distilled water, causing a mortality of N. rufipes adults of 52.00%. The effective concentration dose of the B. bassiana pathogen culture in controlling N. rufipes adults on copra is 23.611. This effective dose is still classified as a low active ingredient content, namely 23.611% = 23.611 g of the B. bassiana pathogen culture in 100 cc of distilled water. Determining this LC50 is crucial for optimizing B. bassiana application strategies. Using the LC50 as a target concentration can help minimize the amount of fungus needed, reducing costs and potential non-target effects, while still achieving effective pest control.

While this study focused on B. bassiana efficacy, the observed mortality is consistent with its known mode of action, which involves cuticle penetration and multiplication within the insect host (Kaur and Padmaja 2008; Indriyati 2009).

The toxicity of insecticides to organisms is usually expressed in terms of LD50 (lethal dose for 50% of insects). In some cases, LC50 is used to express the concentration of insecticide that will kill half of the test insect population (Paramasivam and Selvi 2017). According to Hasyim et al. (2016) and Hasyim et al. (2019), the LC50 value is the concentration that can cause the death of 50% of the pest insects tested in a specific observation.

While more frequent mortality assessments (daily) could have provided a more detailed time course of N. rufipes mortality, we opted for weekly intervals due to the labor-intensive nature of the counts, the desire to minimize disturbance to the experimental setup, preliminary observations that showed minimal changes in mortality at shorter intervals.

Table 3.

Probit Analysis Results for the Effective Concentration (LC50) of B. bassiana Culture on N. rufipes Mortality on Copra.

Confidence Limits
Probability 95% Confidence Limits for Dosis 95% Confidence Limits for log(Dosis)a
Estimate Estimate
PROBIT .010 6.409 .807
.020 7.468 .873
.030 8.228 .915
.040 8.850 .947
.050 9.391 .973
.060 9.877 .995
.070 10.325 1.014
.080 10.742 1.031
.090 11.136 1.047
.100 11.512 1.061
.150 13.208 1.121
.200 14.732 1.168
.250 16.178 1.209
.300 17.598 1.245
.350 19.025 1.279
.400 20.486 1.311
.450 22.006 1.343
.500 23.611 1.373
.550 25.335 1.404
.600 27.214 1.435
.650 29.304 1.467
.700 31.679 1.501
.750 34.460 1.537
.800 37.844 1.578
.850 42.211 1.625
.900 48.427 1.685
.910 50.061 1.700
.920 51.899 1.715
.930 53.998 1.732
.940 56.442 1.752
.950 59.365 1.774
.960 62.993 1.799
.970 67.759 1.831
.980 74.656 1.873
.990 86.981 1.939
a. Logarithm base = 10.

Conclusion and suggestion

Beauveria bassiana effectively controlled Necrobia rufipes on copra, with adult mortality increasing with fungal concentration—reaching a maximum of 69.33% at 30% and a minimum of 14.67% at 10%. Similarly, copra weight loss escalated with pest population density, peaking at 6.87 g with 24 N. rufipes adults and dropping to 1.13 g with 8 adults. The effective lethal concentration (LC50) of B. bassiana for managing N. rufipes was 23.611%, providing a practical biocontrol threshold. To further validate these preliminary laboratory tests findings, field trials are recommended to assess the actual mortality caused by B. bassiana on N. rufipes under real-world conditions.

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to the Rector of Sam Ratulangi University and the Chair of the Research and Community Service Institute at Sam Ratulangi University for providing support for this research.

References

  • Arifin S, Sjam S, Parawansa AK (2022) Kelimpahan Dan Keragaman Jenis Serangga Hama Jagung Di Berbagai Gudang Penyimpanan. Agrotek Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pertanian 6(2): 120–127. https://doi.org/10.33096/agrotek.v6i2.257
  • Fathy Z, Muhammad J, Ali SS (2025) The pathology of native entomopathogenic fungi, Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae (Hypocreales: Clavicipitaceae), on biological processes and ovarian structure of the African migratory locust, Locusta migratoria migratorioides (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control 35: 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-025-00842-7
  • Hasyim A, Setiawati W, Hudayya A, Luthfy N (2016) Sinergisme Jamur Entomopatogen Metarhizium anisopliae Dengan Insektisida Kimia untuk Meningkatkan Mortalitas Ulat Bawang Spodoptera exigua. Jurnal Hortikultura 26(2): 257. https://doi.org/10.21082/jhort.v26n2.2016.p257-266
  • Hasyim A, Setiawati W, Lukman L, Marhaeni LS (2019) Evaluasi Konsentrasi Lethal dan Waktu Lethal Insektisida Botani Terhadap Ulat Bawang (Spodoptera exigua) di Laboratorium. Jurnal Hortikultura 29(1): 69. https://doi.org/10.21082/jhort.v29n1.2019.p69-80
  • Hu G, Wang M, Wang Y, Tang H, Chen R, Zhang Y, Zhao Y, Jin J, Wang Y, Wu M, Wang J (2020) Development of Necrobia rufipes (De Geer, 1775) (Coleoptera: Cleridae) under constant temperatures and its implication in forensic entomology. Forensic Science International 311: 110275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110275
  • Indriyati I (2009) Virulensi Jamur Entomopatogen Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin (Deuteromycotina: Hyphomycetes) Terhadap Kutudaun (Aphis spp.) Dan Kepik Hijau (Nezara viridula). Jurnal Hama Dan Penyakit Tumbuhan Tropika 9(2): 92–98. https://doi.org/10.23960/j.hptt.2992-98
  • Kaur G, Padmaja V (2008) Evaluation of Beauveria bassiana isolates for virulence against Spodoptera litura (Fab.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and their characterization by RAPD-PCR. African Journal of Microbiology Research 2(11): 299–307.
  • Manueke J, Montong VB, Tarore D (2023) Teknologi pengendalian hama Necrobia rufipes de geer pada kopra dengan pengangkap warna lampu pijar dan jamur entomopapatogen Beauveria bassiana Bals (RTUU 2023). Final Report RTUU [Laporan Akhir RTUU 2023] Universitas Sam Ratulangi.
  • Montong VB, Manueke J, Pinaria BAN (2022) Uji daya tangkap jenis perangkap cahaya lampu dan daya bunuh insektisida mikroba dalam pengendalian serangga hama kopra. Final Report RDUU [Laporan Akhir RDUU 2022] Universitas Sam Ratulangi.
  • Nuraini IV, Prakoso B, Suroto A (2022) Survei dan Identifikasi Hama Gudang pada Komoditas Padi, Jagung, dan Kedelai di Kecamatan Batuwarno, Wonogiri. Biofarm Jurnal Ilmiah Pertanian 18(2): 87. https://doi.org/10.31941/biofarm.v18i2.1711
  • Savoldelli S, Jucker C, Peri E, Arif MA, Guarino S (2020) Necrobia rufipes (De Geer) infestation in pet food packaging and setup of a monitoring trap. Insects 11(9): 623. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11090623
  • Tarore D, Manueke J, Montong VB, Semuel MY (2023) Control of rice powder pest Sitophilus oryzae L. with entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae (Metch.). Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 26(2): 56–62. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2023.56.62
  • Wang YL, Li G, Hu C, Kang Y, Guo Y, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Wang J (2022) Development of Necrobia ruficollis (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Cleridae) under different constant temperatures. Insects 13(2022): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13040319
  • Wang Y, Yu N, Chu F, Korai SK, Liu Z (2018) Sublethal effects of Beauveria bassiana sensu lato isolate NJBb2101 on biological fitness and insecticide sensitivity of parental and offspring generations of brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens. Biological Control 121: 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2018.02.007
  • Williams I, Scharf M (2024) Redlegged ham beetle, copra beetle Necrobia rufipes (De Geer, 1775) (Insecta: Coleoptera: Cleridae: Korynetinae): IN1426/EENY-811, 5/2024. EDIS 2024(3). https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-in1426-2024
login to comment